.

Danvers Ends Winter Parking Ban - Should Marblehead?

The town of Danvers ended a winter parking ban Tuesday that dates back more than 40 years. Should Marblehead follow suit?

Residents will now being able to park on Danvers streets overnight this winter unless a snowstorm is approaching.

That was the decision made Tuesday night by the Board of Selectmen in Danvers, which unanimously voted to change a town policy that has existed for more than 40 years banning overnight parking between 1 a.m. and 6 a.m. during the winter.

Meaning that beginning Jan. 1, Danvers' ban will only go into place when a snowstorm is forecasted to drop snow and will still apply only to the hours of 1-6 a.m.

So, we have to ask - should the town Marblehead make changes to its current winter parking policy?

Would you consider a blue light emergency warning system similar to one that was recently-implemented in Peabody?

The winter parking ban will continue until April 15. No parking will be allowed on any street for a period longer than one hour between the hours of midnight and 7 a.m.

Let us know how you feel in the comments section below.

nick December 05, 2012 at 10:28 PM
John, I agree with Walter. Why don't you run for selectman?
John Buba December 05, 2012 at 10:40 PM
Sounds like you have a parking space and don't care about the others. (So do I but I do care about the others.) If it is ok to park in the summer and there is no safety issue, then in the winter when there is no snow on the ground it must be safe to park - right? So if there is snow on the ground and certain streets are not safe then the parking ban can continue for just these streets until the snow is gone. Why do you only support a one size fits all solution - I just don't get it?
John Buba December 05, 2012 at 11:01 PM
Nick and Walter I was on the Fincom - I joined to help the town with its finances, but soon found myself as usually the lone dissenter fighting against increases in taxes without looking at spending first. The FINCOM is supposed to serve as a check and balance on the town budget. But as a group they believe that taxes are not high enough. One budget session I did not support raises for all town employees UNLESS it could be shown that we would not need an override during the term of the contract to fund the raises; neither the Selectmen nor the town administrator would produce such info so I said NO to the raises. Well that was it for my “term” on the Fincom - the Selectmen chose not to reappoint me. I also help lead the fight against Pay to Throw which the Selectmen wanted. As a lone selectman especially with the bunch we have there today it would just be another futile effort. The current team of Selectmen believes their job is to get as much money out of the citizens as possible - they think that we don't pay enough taxes too. So being the lone voice for fiscal restraint is just an exercise in frustration with little chance of success. Now, if both of you want to run too so we can get a majority of the board (3 out of 5), that might be a different story.
Anne Tassel December 06, 2012 at 12:09 PM
Absolutely, as long as we implement the blue light emergency system, it should be fine.
mary p. ayer December 06, 2012 at 02:20 PM
HEY---WE COULD USE YOU IN WASHINGTON!!! SAME STORY! DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE TO RAISE TAXES---(AND PRETEND IT IS JUST FOR THE WEALTHY TOP TWO PERCENT!!) AND NOT CUT SPENDING? ?-- OUR TAXES ARE ALREADY TOO HIGH!!! AND---BRING ON THE BLUE LIGHT SYSTEM!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »