Who Won the Presidential Debate?
Did you think President Barack Obama or former Gov. Mitt Romney won the first debate?
The much anticipated first presidential debate is over and the pundits have spoken.
But we want to know -- who do you think won the debate?
Did you like former Gov. Mitt Romney's approach or back what President Barack Obama had to say.
Some pundits after the debate praised Romney while criticizing the president for being disinterested and not being prepared. However, others said Obama made great points during the health care debate.
What do you think? How would you grade each candidate? Let us know in the comments section.
chester suchecki
10:09 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
prez obama is done. there is no damage control thats going to fix what he screwed up last night. the people of this country have to be total fools to vote for obama.
KlassySalem
10:19 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
There are more debates to come. That pendulum can swing fast.
Steve Marino
8:45 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
When debating face to face with fifty million people watching, it is difficult to make crap up about your opponent without being called out on it! We now know that Obama's ads are meant to fool the people that pay the least attention!
Bob Samson
10:10 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Romney and it was not even close.
Bill
10:14 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Romney=NY Yankees Obama=Boston Red Sox. The cult of personality has be punctured and there is no fixing it. Let's see if the masses stick with him. Sadly, would not surprise me if they do.
As seen on Twitter last night - "That wasn't a debate so much as Mitt Romney just took Obama for a cross country drive strapped to the roof of his car"
hammergjh
10:20 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Wishful thinking. Debates sway fewer voters than you wish they did. While it is widely regarded to have been Romney's night there are more debates to come. And frankly, how many voters are undecided at this point? Obama will still win and our country will be better for it.
If Obama had gone after Romney's gaffes it would've been a different night. Don't know why he didn't. He's too smart to let those opportunities slip by him again in the next contest.
Lisa Jean Baptiste Peterson
11:02 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
I completely agree.
Ron Powell
1:09 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
It's not a question of which voters are undecided. It's a question of which voters are going to show up on November 6. In recent weeks, President Obama's supporters were more energized than Gov. Romney's supporters. Romney held an ever-so-slight lead among independents on crucial swing states. If the debates energize Romney's supporters, he will win the general election. He already has the support of Republicans and a small majority of Independents. They just have to show up. I would say that Romney certainly helped his cause last night.
jmiz
3:20 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
cause he is not as smart as Romney.....
Sean Ward
5:52 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
The reason less Romney supporters show up to vote is because we're at work.
Joan Scanlon
11:39 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
You've got that right Sean Ward!
Rob Hopkins
10:50 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Actually, 18% of voters (by most polls) are undecided. When you factor in registered Independents (like myself) who are undoubtedly voting for Romney, the pollsters data is heavily skewed to Obama and that is erroneous- at best.
Then one has to take into account the policy of a major national pollster who has instructed the people making phone calls/polling to count "unanswered" calls as votes for Obama. There are going to be alot of very sad Liberals on November 5th.
gene
11:27 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
I'm an independent and have no intention on voting for Flip/Flopper Romney. Wait until the debate on Foreign Policy. Romney has embarrased the US everytime he has gone to another country (rmember his recent 3 country tour). Maybe he should consult with Scott Brown. After all Brown regularly meets with Kings and Queens.
Pat
1:13 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Liberals had their chance.
I voted for Obama and I am truly sorry I did. I got caught up in the excitement 1st black man pres. and all that BS, but I now see my mistake.
Obama has done nothing for me as a middle class family, My health insurance is sky high, $6,500 a year for a family plan with a $3500 deductible and that is my cost after my company pays 50%. Obamacare is not going to help me at all.
I pay my taxes and I am an honest person but it sickens me to see my fellow citizens take my money and enjoy the fruits of my labor while I get up every morning and go to work for them. I watch them use their EBT cards to buy smokes, booze, or even gamble... whatever! Things they DON'T really need!
Gas is ridiculous under Obama it has doubled in price, Romney has my vote we no I need change...and help.
Obama and his lies I am done with them...time for this country to tighten up and force these EBT card holders to GET A JOB!
JMB
3:22 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Gene - what a TOOL you are. Can't wait for the foreign policy debate to expose the Obama administration for killing four Americans. There is no bigger embarrassment to the rest of the world than Obama.
gene
3:26 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
EBT cards are controlled by the state so why are you blaming President Obama? By your post it's clear its all about you and not what's best for the country.
Pat
8:43 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
gene,
I am not blaming Obama for the EBT cards disaster but facts are facts Obama and Liberals alike support these type of programs.
Do you think it is right to allow all this abuse right in front of our eyes and not have have an ounce of dignity?
If people need the help then I understand that but are you seriously okay with the way these EBT cards are being used? I don't !! it is disgusting and you should be ashamed at yourself for thinking that the is "best for the country."
This is not the "best for our country" it is wrong and I for one speak up every time I see the abuse. So if I see you in any convenient store trying to buy smokes or booze with your EBT card I will say something and make you look like the lazy a-hole you probably are.
Roberta Conners
11:08 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Was it me or did Romney give off a superior vibe like he was older and wiser than Obama? Kind of felt like that, although Obama is a great speaker. They both made valid points, Romney may have won that one! Sorry!
Michael Quinlan
3:34 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Obama sure didn't sound like a 'great speaker' during the debate. When he was unscripted he performed poorly.
Blackstar
11:13 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Doesn't matter who wins; we are all going to lose.
John Buba
12:09 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Using a basketball analogy:
It is late in the 4th quarter and the team is by 7 points.
At this point in the game the coach is looking for the player with the "Give me the ball Coach - I can do it" attitude."
While there are lots of great players there are only a few like Magic Johnson and Larry Bird who want to be the one with the responsibility on their shoulders to win the game.
Last night Romney demonstrated to America that he "wants the ball."
Obama was more like Wilt Chamberlain or Abdul Jabbar - good players, but never the "go to guy" in a tight game.
CMH
12:10 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Romney won this debate! Obama looked like he was being scolded and didn't know how to respond. This was an opportunity for Romney to convey his agenda to the public and debunk all the rhetoric played out in the adds. I wish more people would really pay attention to the two different strategies the candidates propose and then make an educated choice for the direction our country should be heading now - and the future.
Pat
12:55 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Obama lost and lost bad. It looks like the last 4years were a big lie and now he has a lot of explaining to do. passing obamacare while millions are out of work. poor decision, giving billion to green energy while the middle class get hammered at the pump $4 gal for gas. Obama is in big trouble, time to face the facts, he is nothing without a teleprompter...
Rob Hopkins
1:38 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
your last 6 words is the most accurate description of our President's ability to debate.
Frank quirk
1:01 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Romney won it was by far he best debate.
Harry
2:43 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
I watched the debate last night and I was shocked and disgusted at the same time.
I sat there and I said to myself....Obama I voted for you! I voted for you because I trusted you, I trusted you to make the change you promise and help the middle class get some relief. I have been a very patience man, I have debated others about how we need to give Obama time and give him a break.
Well after last night I feel I have been played...played for a fool. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
This morning my disgust has turned to anger and I am now to the point where I will do everything in my power to help support Mitt Romney for President. I may not agree with everything Mr. Romney stands for but to be fair I did not agree with everything Obama stood for.
Do you think 4 years is enough time for Obama? I didn't before the debate but I now think he has had every chance to get the economy moving again and he has failed. I am blessed that I do have a job but some of my friends are truly hurting, they need to get back to work, for the love of god we need JOBS, not more government run programs!
One thing from last night that shocked me was how Obama seems to brag about cutting taxes $3,600 for middle-class families — Obama said “maybe they can buy a new car.” Are you seriously that out of touch?
Where is this money? I never got a dime? and excuse me but $3,600 is not going to buy any family a safe car.
John B Goode
3:37 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
But the president did as good last night as he's done his whole term?
Steve Marino
8:33 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Would we have voted Carter to a second term? Obama is far worse then Carter was!
Pat
9:03 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Harry,
I am glad you have come to your senses. Obama has been a big mistake and that debate exposed him and the truth. I voted for him last time but I will not make that mistake again.
Like I said before Obama has done nothing for the middle class family. My health insurance is out of this world, so bad in fact that if I am sick I second guess if I should even go to a doctor for fear I will not be able to pay the co pay or the other amounts the doctors charges me.
I see people walk into emergency rooms can barely speak English get all the medical help they need while I wait for hours or even days just to be seen and then I get the bills. Under Obama plans I pay for my medical bills and theirs, take my money (what little I have) and redistribute it.
What has Obama care done for us? nothing I can see except I pay for others now.
This country is in a serious crisis right now and no one gives a crap. Every one seems to want everything for free no one wants to do the work anymore.
I don't have the answers other than it is time for change, Obama has failed, his programs are adding more money to the already ridiculous deficit.
I say give Romney a chance.
Vic Ferrari
8:17 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
i was thinking the same thing. Obama and the Democrats must laugh at us every night on how they can lie and distort and half of the American voting public believes it. Amazing.
JMB
3:24 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
George? George? Where are you? Looks like the mouth is not flapping today.
john
3:28 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
The big question was the debate about the 5 trillion $ tax. Is it true or not? How can we make decisions when we can't get real facts? I am for change and as for foreign policy,I think we should cut way back on foreign aid and start a new foregin policy that puts US first.
Bettie Hamilton
3:44 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Romney was by far clearer on his plans, and much more presidential looking and acting, I felt proud of him. I admire him to come out so positively when most of the media fawn over Obama, I haven't yet figured out why they do?!! Bettie 10/4
Tricia
12:23 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Romney looked and acted like a character in Men in Black; and I'm talking about one of the aliens. So, he lost in style and substance as far as I'm concerned.
John Buba
5:06 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Regarding Romney’s Tax plan; the reason he and the president keep going back and forth over this is because they both use different approaches for evaluating Romney's plan.
The President and the Congressional Budget Office use "Static Analysis". That means if you cut a tax then you must offset that cut in revenue with a corresponding spending cut. Their analysis assumes that people WILL NOT change their behavior in response to the tax cut.
Romney uses "Dynamic Analysis of his plan. Under dynamic analysis Romney calculates that with lower taxes, the economy will grow as people spend and invest the money from the tax cut. When the economy grows people make more income and thus pay more taxes which helps to offset the revenue lost to the tax cut.
It has been shown that tax cuts do in fact produce an increase in tax revenue (both under Kennedy and Regan / Clinton). That is how the Clinton presidency erased the deficit.
Hope this was not too wonk-ish for you all, but this explains how they both keep asserting that two contradictory opinions are both correct.
I believe that dynamic analysis is a more correct analysis because people do change behaviors depending on tax policy. Just look at what happens during a tax holiday here in Massachusetts.
Steve Marino
8:22 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
As a business grows and makes more money, it too pays more tax to the Fed which in turn would lower the deficit!
Mikbee
11:20 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
I would agree with the "Dynamics" if everything was made in America. Mostly everything was made in America when Kennedy was president and alot more so than today when Reagan was president. Those Dynamics won't result in much growth with all our manufacturing being done in other countries. A purely tax cut approach now would have feeble results in respect to job creation. We just wouldn't be getting the biggest bang for the buck. A lot of the Reagan tax cuts are still in place although modified from the orignal versions, and the Bush tax cuts are still in place. Which begs the question, where is the additional tax revenue and where are the jobs?
Bonnie-Jean
7:03 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
If our family paid less in taxes, we would absolutely spend more! In addition to saving, we could do a yearly vacation, buy a nicer car, make home improvements more often rather than once a year. But since obama wants to spread my wealth, I have to spend very wisely and cautiously. Please let Romney win, obama is a disaster and a joke. I didn't vote for him 4 years ago. He disgusts me. We are not communist China. We are not Cuba. If you want something, earn it! You are not entitled to things "just because"
Steve Marino
9:22 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Or use the money to take a chance and start a business?
Mikbee
9:25 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
The Bush tax cuts were the last tax you'll see for the rest of your life. They didn't pay for themselves and blew the debt to ridiculous heights. We are still coming in a trillion dollars short every year because of those tax cuts. Make no mistake about one thing, when Romney talks about tax cuts he not talking about you. You are the victim of the policies he endorses. What does it take for you to figure that out? We are not going back to Bush Wonderland based on one debate performance. Nobody's buying what Romney is selling. We have seen it all before and it just dosen't work it only makes things worse.
Steve Marino
11:39 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Hey mikbee, when our great leader Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, he cut taxes in half for All hard working taxpayers and we had an economic boom for decades which allowed the Fed to collect more tax revenue due to the millions more workers paying taxes as well as company's making more money and paying more taxes.
Dept is caused by over spending of Big Government!
Your argument about cutting taxes causing dept is not based in fact, but rather a liberal talking point to confuse the uninformed.
The great Democratic leader John F Kennedy did the same as well with simaler results.
As far as the Bush tax cuts, did we forget 9/11. This cause a recession at the time, and his tax cuts pulled us out of it. The reason the dept rose under his administration was because he never vetoed a single spending bill by congress because he wanted to show bipartinship. Not a good choice on his part.
Under Obama, the dept has increased by 500,000,000,000,000.00 because the democratically controlled senate has not passed a budget in 4 years which allows Obama to spent freely with not restraints.
Alan Zall
2:12 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Steve, after the Reagan tax cuts in 81, un-employment jumped to 10.8%. In the next 7 years, he raised taxes 7 times and increased the budget deficit by 300% at the same time while increasing the size of the government. Although it's popular to put him on a dais, he was not the fiscally responsible president that he has been remembered as.
Mikbee
2:22 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Reagan had to scale back his original tax cuts and George Bush had to increase taxes when he took over from Reagan. They were forced to do that because of the alarming increase in the debt. The first thing Clinton had to do was to further scale back the Reagan tax cuts because the deficits were too high. Those tax cuts never paid for themselves. You want to give Reagan credit for the tax cuts, and blame the deomocrats for any increase in spending at the same time. Reagan would have had to sign off on any big spending bills. A budget is a piece of paper with numbers on it but it's worthless if Congress won't vote on it. Don't be fooled by the talk of the lack of a budget. We know we are a trillion short of a balanced budget we don't need an official budget to tell us that. All a budget would is tell us what we already know. The debt has increased under Obama mostly because the Bush tax cuts are still in place.
It's been proven that tax cuts don't pay for themselves. We just can't keep doing the same thing and expect different results. It's been tried, it dosen't work, there won't be another round even if Romney gets elected. The CBO would score the Romney plan for what it is, a budget buster. And nobody would vote for it not even Republicans.
Michael Quinlan
3:55 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Reagan tax cut plan was changed by Democrats to have the tax cuts phased in over three years (82 - 84). When the complete tax cut was effective ('84) the economy boomed for many years thereafter. Democrats controlled House and Senate from 81 - 87 (fully two thirds of Reagan's administration) which is why domestic spending exploded. Reagan got his defense expension (goodbye Soviet Union) and Democrats took expanded domestic spending.
Steve Marino
5:08 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Well said Michael. Alan, the unemployment jumped thru the roof when Carter raised the top rate to 70 percent. This also set the stage for US company's to move overseas due to higher taxation. Which still happens today because we have the highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world and is a large part of the reason for our high unemployment rate.
Mikbee,when Reagan was building up our military, congress added wasteful spending measures to these same military spending bills dollar for dollar because if Reagan wanted to build up the milatary to collapse the Soviet Union, congress felt it could spend like drunken sailors instead of tightning it's belt.
This caused the dept and the democrats blamed it on Reagan. If Reagan had the power of a line item veto, he could have scraped this wasteful spending.
Also, the dept back then was very very small compared to the dept created by Obama. So much so that the dept Obama has created In just three and a half years, is more then all of our presidents combined.so lets quite with the democratic talking point lies!
Sean Ward
5:19 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Another reason for the exodus of jobs to other countries is the democratic parties support and encouragement of the unions. Unions once stood for fairness and protecting the rights of workers. Now they just legalized gangs strongarming corporations and stripping away profitability.
Bonnie H.
8:24 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
Yeah! Go Team Romney!
Tricia
11:51 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Obama won the debate if you take into account content and substance. Obama, like most democrats tend to do, took the high road. The media fueled reaction to the debate will change how Obama handles the next one, so look out Bonnie, Obama will be a shoe in come Nov 6!!!
Meadow Lane
12:09 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Romney bounded off the stage on Wednesday night with a wide grin from cheek to cheek, proud of himself for delivering all the ‘zingers’ his staff wrote up for him.
But here’s the problem: he just made stuff up. By one count, he lied 27 times in 38 minutes! On Medicare, on Obamacare, on taxes, on Wall Street Reform, on you name it... Mitt said whatever came to his mind just to to score political points.
Without the folks from Fact Check at your side...you can't trust what Romney says. That's not the kind of President I want. Bush was like that and then he got his ass kicked on foreign policy and again on the domestic economy. Two wars and the worst recession since the Great Depression.
We can't afford Bush and we can't afford Romney either. Worst of all; neither can be trusted again.
Obama won my vote again.
Jennifer
1:42 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
You are lying and Obama always had your vote. That was another lie that he won your vote. Now go renew your EBT card and don't forget to vote for medical marijuana your Masshealth will pay for your weed now and your EBT card can be for a new bong.
Steve Marino
5:59 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Well said Sean, it's a money laundering scheme. The unions donate heavily to Obama, and Obama kicks it back to the unions. One example comes to mind, the majority of the so called stimulus money went to the irresponsible states that made irresposable promises to public unions to pay them off to make sure they continue to endorse and vote for Obama and democrats alike. And we wonder why the stimulus didn't work!
The strong majority of these irresposable states are controlled by democrats, go figure!
Vic Ferrari
8:09 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
we gave the Ferrari to a kid and he wrecked it. Now time to give it to problem solvers b4 we go over the cliff. A person with no life experiences has no chance at running a country let a lone trying to fix problems. That is why he got schooled in the debates by Romney. Without a democrat written teleprompter speech Obama is nothing.
Jim Aspen
9:54 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
The magazine's Oct. 15 cover features Mitt Romney debating an empty chair instead of President Barack Obama, just as Clint Eastwood did at the Republican National Convention.
“This image seemed like a proper response to the first Presidential debate, but I’m not sure I realized how hard it is to caricature furniture," Barry Blitt told The New Yorker about his cover, “One on One."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/the-new-yorker-eastwooding-137676.html?hp=r1
Jim Aspen
6:20 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Jay Leno goes after the President again.
Early in his opening monologue, the NBC Tonight Show host said of the stellar television ratings for Wednesday night's debate, "The only person who didn't tune in, I think, was President Obama"
What a crowd! Man! Yeah! You sound like Republicans watching last night's debate. Oh, my gosh. Well, the consensus is Mitt Romney won the presidential debate last night. The only people that thought Obama won - the replacement refs. Those are the only ones.
They're saying close to 60 million people may have watched the debate. In fact, the only person who didn't tune in, I think, was President Obama. What happened? [Laughter] Even Tony Romo was going, “What happened?”
Jim Smith
12:34 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
What E. W. Jackson says about Barack Obama's Hypocrisy !
http://youtu.be/Oi_KaZ53eDg
$5.00 per gallon gas, no jobs and lot's of lies equals a no vote for Obama !
Native Indian mis-representation, claiming minority status for a job, same, No Vote !
Tierney, a sneak, a liar, a fraud, a cheat, off shore gambling, threw his wife under the bus, definitely a no vote !
I drive around our neighborhoods seeing Obama, Tierney, Warren signs, tells me volumes concerning the character of those who have those signs represent their values !
I am ashamed to live among neighbors who advocate, lying, cheating, stealing, fraud, deception and to vote felons into office. And these same people teach our children and lead our families.
Tricia
12:16 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
The Republican Party represents the super rich only. With the Citizens United decision they have even more money to pay for all the deceptive commercials and secure more power and wealth for the 1%. Reasonable people can see what is really going on and will vote for ALL the democrats across the board. If I'm wrong about this and the Republicans get control, we can look forward to another prop 2.5 or more cuts in education, police, and firefighter budgets. Next on the Republican agenda, dismantle medicare and social security etc. Hey, Romney needs to get that car elevator installed at his La Jolla mansion!!!